Infosec Brigade

Secure Your AI-Enabled Applications Before They're Weaponised

Purpose-built penetration testing for LLM-powered apps, AI agents, RAG pipelines, and generative AI systems — uncovering novel attack surfaces that conventional tools miss entirely.

AI-Enabled Application Security Testing | Elite Security Services
OWASP LLM Top 10 Aligned
ISO 27001:2022 Certified
AI Security Specialist Team
24/7 Incident Response
VAPT Certificate Issued

What is AI-Enabled Application Security Testing?

AI-Enabled Application Security Testing is a specialist assessment designed for applications that integrate large language models, generative AI, autonomous agents, or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines — attack surfaces that traditional application pentesting frameworks were never built to cover.

Our AI security engineers manually probe every layer of your AI stack: system prompts, model APIs, tool-calling chains, vector databases, embeddings pipelines, and agent orchestration logic — uncovering prompt injection, data exfiltration, model inversion, and trust boundary failures that automated scanners cannot detect.

  • 🧠
    LLM-Native Threat Modelling We map every adversarial path specific to your AI architecture — from jailbreaks to indirect prompt injection — before your users discover them.
  • 🏅
    Regulatory & AI Act Readiness Align with EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and emerging AI security standards — with documented evidence of adversarial robustness validation.
  • 🛡️
    Data Leakage & PII Protection Identify training data extraction, system prompt leakage, and cross-user context contamination vectors before they expose sensitive customer data.
  • Zero Disruption to AI Services All adversarial testing conducted safely against your AI stack with no model poisoning, no production data corruption, and no service interruption.
AI Vulnerability Distribution
Prompt Injection (Direct & Indirect)78%
System Prompt / Training Data Leakage71%
Insecure Agent Tool Permissions65%
RAG Poisoning & Groundedness Bypass58%
Jailbreaks & Safety Guardrail Bypass52%
Insecure Output Handling & Injection44%

Based on aggregated AI application assessment data · 2023–2025

Our AI Application Security Testing Methodology

A rigorous, six-phase process aligned to OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, and MITRE ATLAS — delivering thorough, defensible results across every AI component in your stack.

01
🗺️
AI Architecture Mapping

Enumerate all AI components: LLM endpoints, agent tools, RAG pipelines, vector stores, embedding models, and trust boundaries across the full AI application stack.

02
🔎
Threat Modelling & Attack Surface

Model AI-specific threats: prompt injection vectors, context window abuse, tool misuse paths, data flow across model boundaries, and adversarial input surface mapping.

03
🔬
Adversarial Probing

Manual adversarial testing of LLM behaviour — jailbreaks, prompt leakage, guardrail bypass, data extraction, role confusion, and hallucination exploitation.

04
⚔️
Agent & Tool Exploitation

Controlled exploitation of AI agent pipelines — indirect prompt injection via tools, function call abuse, privilege escalation, and autonomous action chain subversion.

05
🔓
RAG & Data Pipeline Testing

Poisoning attacks on vector databases, groundedness bypass, embedding inversion, cross-user context leakage, and retrieval manipulation to corrupt AI outputs.

06
📋
Reporting & Remediation

Executive summary, full technical report with CVSS v3.1 and OWASP LLM severity ratings, attack chain diagrams, guardrail recommendations, and prioritised remediation roadmap.

📊
OWASP LLM Severity Scoring

Every finding mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 categories and rated with CVSS v3.1, with annotated attack chain diagrams for rapid remediation prioritisation.

🔁
Free Retest Included

After remediation, we re-probe all identified vulnerabilities at no additional cost and issue a formal VAPT Certificate upon successful closure.

🔐
Secure Client Portal

Live access to findings, AI-specific remediation guidance, and historical reports through an encrypted client dashboard.

What We Test Across Your AI Stack

Full-spectrum coverage across LLM integrations, autonomous agent systems, and RAG data pipelines — assessed from every adversarial angle your users and attackers can reach.

🧠
Layer

LLM Integration Testing

Targets the core language model integration: prompt injection, system prompt extraction, jailbreaking, safety guardrail bypass, insecure output handling, and model denial-of-service. We test all input/output channels your application exposes to end users or internal systems.

Prompt Injection Jailbreaking Guardrail Bypass Output Injection Token Limit Abuse
🤖
Layer

AI Agent & Tool Security

Tests autonomous AI agents that use tools, call APIs, browse the web, or execute code. We probe indirect prompt injection via tool outputs, privilege escalation through function calls, unintended autonomous actions, and trust boundary failures in multi-agent architectures.

Indirect Injection Tool Abuse Code Execution Agent Hijacking Multi-Agent Trust
🗄️
Layer

RAG & Data Pipeline Testing

Assesses retrieval-augmented generation pipelines: vector database poisoning, adversarial document injection, groundedness bypass, embedding inversion, cross-user context leakage, and manipulation of the retrieval ranking that shapes model responses.

RAG Poisoning Embedding Inversion Context Leakage Retrieval Manipulation PII Extraction

Choose Your AI Security Assessment Approach

Three adversarial engagement models — aligned to your level of internal AI documentation and the realism of the threat scenario you need to simulate.

Zero Knowledge
🌑
Black-Box AI Test
No source code, no system prompt, no model details
  • Simulates an external attacker or malicious end user
  • Blind prompt injection and jailbreak discovery
  • API fuzzing and output analysis for leakage
  • Realistic threat: public-facing AI chatbots & copilots
Partial Knowledge
🌗
Grey-Box AI Test
System prompt and architecture shared; model weights withheld
  • Simulates a privileged insider or leaked prompt scenario
  • Targeted injection against known prompt structure
  • Agent tool enumeration with partial permission context
  • Realistic threat: SaaS AI features & internal copilots
Full Knowledge
🌕
White-Box AI Test
Full access: prompts, code, pipelines, vector databases
  • Deepest coverage across the entire AI architecture
  • RAG pipeline, embedding and retrieval logic audit
  • Code review of agent orchestration & tool definitions
  • Realistic threat: pre-launch hardening & compliance

Every AI Attack Surface, Tested

Our assessments span the full OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS threat catalogue — covering every known AI-specific attack class.

💉
LLM01
Prompt Injection
🔓
LLM02
Insecure Output Handling
📦
LLM03
Training Data Poisoning
🤖
LLM04
Model Denial of Service
🔗
LLM05
Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
🔍
LLM06
Sensitive Info Disclosure
🛡️
LLM07
Insecure Plugin Design
🕹️
LLM08
Excessive Agency
🌊
LLM09
Overreliance on AI Output
⚗️
LLM10
Model Theft & Extraction
🗄️
RAG
Vector DB Poisoning
🕵️
Recon
AI Asset Exposure Mapping

The Highest Standard of AI Security Testing

We don't just meet industry benchmarks — we help define them. Every AI security engagement is conducted by specialists who build and break AI systems daily.

🏅

OWASP LLM & MITRE ATLAS Aligned

Fully aligned to the OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS adversarial ML threat matrix — every finding mapped, classified, and cross-referenced for audit-ready documentation.

📄

Meticulous AI-Specific Reporting

Every finding documented with attack chain diagrams, adversarial prompt reproductions, impact evidence, CVSS v3.1 scoring, and prioritised guardrail recommendations — never a generic checklist.

👨‍💻

AI Red Team Specialists

Every engineer on your engagement specialises in AI security: ML engineering backgrounds combined with offensive security expertise. No generalists — only practitioners who understand both disciplines.

🔄

Free Retest & AI Security Certificate

We verify every remediation at no additional cost. Upon successful closure, we issue an AI Security VAPT Certificate — a trusted credential for clients, auditors, and AI governance stakeholders.

Frameworks & Standards
🛡️ ISO 27001:2022
ISO 9001:2015
🤖 OWASP LLM Top 10
🎯 MITRE ATLAS
📋 NIST AI RMF
🌐 EU AI Act Aligned

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about our AI-Enabled Application Security Testing service.

What makes AI application security different from regular app pentesting? +
Traditional application pentesting targets deterministic code paths — SQL injection, XSS, broken auth. AI applications introduce fundamentally non-deterministic attack surfaces: prompt injection exploits natural language interfaces, jailbreaks manipulate model behaviour through adversarial inputs, and RAG pipelines can be poisoned to alter what the model "knows." These require specialist AI red team skills and AI-specific frameworks like OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS — conventional OWASP Top 10 methods simply don't cover this attack class.
What types of AI applications do you test? +
We test any application with an AI component: LLM-powered chatbots and customer-facing copilots, internal AI assistants, agentic systems with tool access, RAG-based knowledge bases, AI coding assistants, content generation platforms, AI-powered APIs, multi-modal applications, and custom fine-tuned model deployments. We support all major LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, and self-hosted open-source models.
What is prompt injection and why is it so dangerous? +
Prompt injection is the AI equivalent of SQL injection: an attacker embeds malicious instructions within user input (or data the AI processes) that override the developer's intended system prompt, causing the model to act against its design. Direct injection targets the user interface; indirect injection hides instructions in documents, web pages, or tool outputs the AI retrieves autonomously. In agentic systems, a successful injection can cause the AI to exfiltrate data, send emails, execute code, or take harmful actions on behalf of the attacker — all without user awareness.
Will testing affect our production AI system or model? +
No. Our methodology is carefully designed to probe AI behaviour without corrupting your production model, poisoning your vector database, or causing service disruption. We operate against staging environments where possible, use controlled adversarial inputs that don't persist in model state, and coordinate all testing windows with your team. Fine-tuned or self-hosted models are assessed without any modifications to model weights or training data.
Do you test AI agents with access to real tools and APIs? +
Yes — AI agent testing is one of our core specialisations. We evaluate agents that use function calling, code interpreters, web browsing, email, calendar, CRM, and any other tool integrations. We probe for indirect prompt injection via tool outputs (e.g., malicious content in a web page the agent reads), privilege escalation through tool permission chains, unintended autonomous actions, and the trust boundaries between agents in multi-agent architectures. All exploitation is performed in a controlled, non-destructive manner in coordination with your engineering team.
How often should we conduct AI security testing? +
We recommend AI security testing at every major model or pipeline change — new LLM provider, updated system prompt, new agent tools, or RAG knowledge base expansion — as these can introduce new attack surfaces. As a baseline, annual comprehensive assessments cover the evolving threat landscape. Organisations deploying AI in regulated environments (financial services, healthcare, legal) or high-risk contexts benefit from quarterly adversarial red team exercises given the rapidly evolving AI threat landscape.
GET STARTED

Fast-track Penetration testing

Start testing in 24 hours. Connect directly with our security experts. And centralize your testing with InfoSec Brigade

Connect With Us